The aquamarine is the blue or blue-green forms of the mineral Beryl. The word "aquamarine" comes from Latin for "sea water". It is usually heated to enhance the blue color.
There is a lot of legendary uses for the stone. It was the most appropriate gift for a wedding couple after their first night together. And said to enhance romance between couples. The Romans used it - specifically carved in a frog shape - to reconcile enemies. But there are other examples where it has been used in ancient times for similar purposes.
It is a symbol of youth - happiness - and is said to provide its wearer with oracle perceptions. It was also used in this manner as the best stone for a fortune teller's ball during Medieval times.
The largest aquamarine found was in 1910 - the stone weighed 243 pounds. It was cut into smaller stones creating over 200,000 carats.
Wouldn't that be nice to run across!
Happy birthday to all those March birthdays!
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
The Making of the Vancouver Olympic Medals
I have been an Olympiholic the last two weeks. I am fascinated by the dedication of the human spirit, and the diversity of sport. I have been glued to my seat through hours of curling, skiing, skating, and so much more.
Along this two week journey, as a craftsman I became acutely aware of the Olympic medals so I did some research (spent two seconds typing in a search term) and discovered a video about the artist of the Vancouver medals and her inspiration for this year's awards. Pretty fascinating stuff - available at: http://www.vancouver2010.com/olympic-medals/vancouver-2010-medals/
But of course that was too easy so I did some research into how they came up with gold, silver, and bronze for the medals in the first place and discovered (little to my surprise) that the Greeks weren't so into giving medal as awards. The first medals were presented at an Olympic game at the onset of what is called "the modern games" beginning in 1896. But at that game they were after my heart awarding silver for first place and bronze for second. Just the two, nothing for third.
The current medals are actually mostly silver with a coating of gold for the first place winner. The medals for the Summer have developed to having an image of Nike, goddess of victory on one side with the host nation designing the back. The winter games still have a pretty open design based on the whims and fancy of the host nation.... curious to see what the Russians will do in 2016, but there are a lot of games to watch before then.
Along this two week journey, as a craftsman I became acutely aware of the Olympic medals so I did some research (spent two seconds typing in a search term) and discovered a video about the artist of the Vancouver medals and her inspiration for this year's awards. Pretty fascinating stuff - available at: http://www.vancouver2010.com/olympic-medals/vancouver-2010-medals/
But of course that was too easy so I did some research into how they came up with gold, silver, and bronze for the medals in the first place and discovered (little to my surprise) that the Greeks weren't so into giving medal as awards. The first medals were presented at an Olympic game at the onset of what is called "the modern games" beginning in 1896. But at that game they were after my heart awarding silver for first place and bronze for second. Just the two, nothing for third.
The current medals are actually mostly silver with a coating of gold for the first place winner. The medals for the Summer have developed to having an image of Nike, goddess of victory on one side with the host nation designing the back. The winter games still have a pretty open design based on the whims and fancy of the host nation.... curious to see what the Russians will do in 2016, but there are a lot of games to watch before then.
Monday, February 1, 2010
The Necklace
So as I was making chains over the weekend I started to wonder about the history of necklaces. Men and woman now seem to like them - so why not in ancient times? We see through much of art history in the drawings and statues that people wore all different types of neck pieces, chains, jewels, and often found objects as adornments around their neck. But I was surprised to find that archeologists have found strung shells that date back over 75,000 years ago. Of course they are not sure if this was worn around the neck, but what do you think when through the first person's mind when they tied a bunch of shells to a string and then they somehow ended up around the neck. Was it an easier way of carrying home supper when hands were full with spears and knives? Did it start out as a status symbol for the leader (alpha male)? Or was there a princess in the group who just felt the need to pretty herself?
Whatever the reason, I am very happy that they made that decision so many years ago and have enjoyed seeing the fruits of their idea throughout the ages.
Whatever the reason, I am very happy that they made that decision so many years ago and have enjoyed seeing the fruits of their idea throughout the ages.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Grandma's Bracelet Gets a New Name
So today's tidbit of history goes all the way back to 1987. Apparently, tennis star Chris Everett made more than sport's history when she played in the U.S. Open that year. One game was stopped, momentarily, as she was given time to find an in-line diamond bracelet that had broken during the match. Such a simple action lead to the re-naming of the inline diamond bracelet as "tennis" bracelet.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Garnet's More Abrasive Side
The garnet is well known as the birthstone of January, and I have known that other hand workers, like myself, love utilizing its beautiful array of varied colors in jewelry designs. What I was unaware of, were other hand workers who utilize the more abrasive side of the garnet.
Garnets are known for their abrasive qualities and are used as the abrasive texture on sandpaper preferred by woodworkers when finishing bare wood. It is also used in many other abrasive techniques including sandblasting, and cutting steel. And finally incorporated in water filtration. Apparently, there is garnet-rich sand in large quantities in Australia and India - hmmm it is too bad that they are not these brilliant red beaches next to blue waters - wouldn't that be something. But it is interesting the varying uses of this month's birthstone.
Garnets were also among the first semiprecious stones to be mentioned in writings from ancient times. They have a deep history with warriors and journeyers. Other references have been made to the garnet's association with fire and illumination. It has been said that garnet was hung in the Ark by Noah to light the path and the inside of the boad. Healers today use garnet in cures for nightmares.
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Precious? Semi-precious? It was all Greek to Me
So I was once told that the rating of gems as "precious" and "semi-precious" stones was something that dated back to the Ancient Greeks. After some research - as with most rumors in Art History - I no longer believe that to be the case.
It seems that the ratings came into existence in the late 1800s. Even if that is the case, however, I am still blown away that this rating still has the hold it has on the gem industry. Four stones - diamond, emerald, ruby, and sapphire are considered "precious" gems. All other gemstones are "semi-precious". It is that basic.
There are so many gems that are rare and at times more expensive than these - but just these four are at the top of their game (so to speak).
Throughout Art History there are the trends where pearls, lapis lazuli, carnelian, and other stones have all had their high ranking places in society. Now tastes and trends change with wind direction - but still the four gemstones stand strong in their rating.
Additionally, there is only one standard rating system in all of gemstones and that is for white diamonds. Nothing else that I have researched is standardized.
This has been especially helpful, for me personally, when I am shopping for gemstones all over the world. In fact, I recently purchased three types of "semi-precious" gemstones for a project - all round microfacted cut, all claimed to be AAA, and all were listed at the same size. I bought them from three different reputable vendors from three distinctly different parts of the world. And the beads I received are not even the same size, let alone the differences in quality and clarity.
So as with most things - buy what you like and buy what you think is pretty.
It seems that the ratings came into existence in the late 1800s. Even if that is the case, however, I am still blown away that this rating still has the hold it has on the gem industry. Four stones - diamond, emerald, ruby, and sapphire are considered "precious" gems. All other gemstones are "semi-precious". It is that basic.
There are so many gems that are rare and at times more expensive than these - but just these four are at the top of their game (so to speak).
Throughout Art History there are the trends where pearls, lapis lazuli, carnelian, and other stones have all had their high ranking places in society. Now tastes and trends change with wind direction - but still the four gemstones stand strong in their rating.
Additionally, there is only one standard rating system in all of gemstones and that is for white diamonds. Nothing else that I have researched is standardized.
This has been especially helpful, for me personally, when I am shopping for gemstones all over the world. In fact, I recently purchased three types of "semi-precious" gemstones for a project - all round microfacted cut, all claimed to be AAA, and all were listed at the same size. I bought them from three different reputable vendors from three distinctly different parts of the world. And the beads I received are not even the same size, let alone the differences in quality and clarity.
So as with most things - buy what you like and buy what you think is pretty.
Friday, January 22, 2010
Thursday, January 21, 2010
More Precious than Gold
As a chain maker one of the things I do is watch the precious metal market. Gold has been unceasingly climbing over the past few years - as has silver my primary metal of use. Looking at this reminds me of the stories of when gold was not the most prized metal - at one time it was of all things aluminum.
Aluminum is the most abundent metal in the Earth's crust. But it is hard to find in its pure state. Before the scientific process known as the Hall-Heroult process was discovered - which more easily removes aluminum from other ores - Aluminum was more valued than gold. One source I found cited that Napoleon III gave a banquet where the most honored guests ate from flatware made from pure almuinum while the rest of the guests "had to make do" with gold utensils.
But as a resident of the District of Columbia the most facinating fact, for me, is that the top of the Washington Monument is a pyramid of solid aluminum. And while many sources I found seemed to speak to the fact that it is aluminum because of its great value, an article shines a light on the fact that it may just have been an act of circumstance. It seems that the foundry that the monument's engineer employed to make the top was run by a man by the name of William Frishmuth, the only U.S. producer of aluminum at the time.
There is a great source for detailed information about the top of the monument available from the JOM - the Journal for the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society called "The Point of a Monument: A History of the Aluminum Cap of the Washington Monument.
Aluminum is the most abundent metal in the Earth's crust. But it is hard to find in its pure state. Before the scientific process known as the Hall-Heroult process was discovered - which more easily removes aluminum from other ores - Aluminum was more valued than gold. One source I found cited that Napoleon III gave a banquet where the most honored guests ate from flatware made from pure almuinum while the rest of the guests "had to make do" with gold utensils.
But as a resident of the District of Columbia the most facinating fact, for me, is that the top of the Washington Monument is a pyramid of solid aluminum. And while many sources I found seemed to speak to the fact that it is aluminum because of its great value, an article shines a light on the fact that it may just have been an act of circumstance. It seems that the foundry that the monument's engineer employed to make the top was run by a man by the name of William Frishmuth, the only U.S. producer of aluminum at the time.
There is a great source for detailed information about the top of the monument available from the JOM - the Journal for the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society called "The Point of a Monument: A History of the Aluminum Cap of the Washington Monument.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
